🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.