🔗 Share this article

Itranspired the manager was able to withstand defeat by Grimsby. Survive a decisive continental showpiece versus one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive home defeats to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, undermining the team's most promising academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the worst the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to engage. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership defender in Blackburn’s championship 1994-95 season, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and appears to have missed. Even the most casual observer can see the irony here: a coach who often railed his squad for failing in individual battles succumbing when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of a England's top division's most feared football executives.

In truth, this entire painful saga appears to portray the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his brief stint in a similar role at Southampton, to view him as merely a functionary within the club's structure: an individual who owed his position as much to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless Dan Ashworth before him, Jason Wilcox has proved himself to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that United’s mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.

The Tactical Conflict Over System and Philosophy

For example, this was the director , after having been part of the hierarchy that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his favored formation. Naturally, these pleas faced pushback. But perhaps such directives hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth with the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually he might agree to outline his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is departing with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks publicly, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – men like Jason Wilcox – simply operate at a level beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being prepared to comprehend it.

The Supreme Authority In Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the true genius behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, simply carrying out the commands of his superior the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to embrace analytics and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he announced that the team's approach to football “will be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical football matters, leveraging his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Above all he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply better. Who else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the building of a modern arena that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Above Managers

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels football. Historically, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and drive to go into an organization and implement their plan through to completion. But how many companies have these guys established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the tactics by the directors and appoint a coach who can tailor their offering to suit. If coaches were once chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the food, but still finally accountable should it be delivered cold or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged while the people who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Game: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance in action: the elevation of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose choices are always untouchable, whose mistakes can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the system coach only to fire them for playing too much that system. Bring in the project manager and then discard them for requiring too long. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.